The Clintons vs Obamas - 2016 Campaign

Telegraph: Reports the following, " Hilary denies criticising Barack Obama's policy towards Iraq and Syria after appearing to distance herself from the US President ahead of a likely bid to replace him in 2016 "

Lets Get Real: 

The Clinton's might be worried that if Hillary goes to quick to the center of US politics there might be a challenge on the left, also a sitting US President can either help or hurt the 2016 nominee, at the moment President Obama's polls are not great, but it should be recalled that Obama is from Chicago, the White House and Democrats have already gone on the attack that Republicans have a WAR ON WOMEN, that if the Republicans take the Senate they could impeach President Obama for the various political scandals of his administration.    Thus POTUS might cut a real deal with Iran over its nuclear plans, the Democrats could pull fast one and take the House, thus Obama could push through his Agenda.    The Clinton's do no like to lose, thus they will put out this brush fire, but in the General Election expect the Clinton's to dump on Obama from on high if that what it takes to win in 2016. 

Iraq Update 2 - Middle East Crisis

Guardian - Iraq Live: Reports the following, " In a sign of Britain’s growing involvement in Iraq the prime minister also confirmed that British forces would also play a leading role in airlifting Yazidi refugees from Mount Sinjar. Chinook helicopters deployed to the region are expected to join a US-led operation in the coming days to airlift the refugees.

The RAF will be flying in Soviet-era weapons from former Warsaw pact countries in eastern Europe to the Kurds who are trained in the use of weapons which originated from the Soviet Union. The Kurds have not requested British weapons. "

Lets Get Real:

The PM might be on a winning strategy with keeping British support at its most basic, helping those stuck on Mount Sinjar and letting the US be the airforce for the Kurds and making sure the Kurds have the right weapons to fight IS.   A recent UK poll it should support for the UK taking action, how long would that last if something goes wrong, a Jet, or a helicopter goes wrong, or the SAS are caught by the IS.   Public opinion can change in a second. all those that want the UK to take military action will change when its British deaths that are been reporting on the 24/7 news.   Thus good for the UK to take a background role, let the US and the French take the major risks, about time the French did some heroics, its not something they are known for, lets ge honest HERE. 

Iraq Update - Iraq Crisis

BBC News: Reports " Britain will "play a role" in an international mission to rescue stranded Yazidi refugees in Iraq, Prime Minister David Cameron has said. "

Lets Get Real:

The Coalition PM David Cameron is playing it safe after the failure of the Syria vote last year, lets see what the other political parties, say, Labour and the Liberal Democrats have been very quiet, let them call for UK to take part in the air strikes against IS, then the PM can say he will following the will of House of Commons.   This might sound a bit heartless, and it is, politics is politics at the end of the day, why should PM Cameron take the political risk when the other leaders have not made a major statement on the IS and the threat to various minority  religious groups in Iraq.    The British with the US and France are doing the best they can, no one wants to put troops on the ground in Iraq, it will have to happen, it just depends on who goes to far, and who is willing to risk their political career on action in Iraq. 

Obama on Iraq - Iraq Crisis

The White House: President Obama's weekly address was on Iraq, the President stated the following, " This week, I authorized two operations in Iraq.  First, I directed our military to take action to protect our American diplomats and military advisors serving in the city of Erbil.  In recent days, terrorist forces neared the city.  Thursday night, I made it clear that if they attempted to advance further, our military would respond with targeted strikes.  That’s what we’ve done.  And, if necessary, that’s what we will continue to do.  We have Americans serving across Iraq, including our embassy in Baghdad, and we’ll do whatever is needed to protect our people.

Second, we’ve begun a humanitarian effort to help those Iraqi civilians trapped on that mountain. The terrorists that have taken over parts of Iraq have been especially brutal to religious minorities—rounding up families, executing men, enslaving women, and threatening the systematic destruction of an entire religious community, which would be genocide. 

The thousands—perhaps tens of thousands—of Iraqi men, women and children who fled to that mountain were starving and dying of thirst.  The food and water we airdropped will help them survive.  I’ve also approved targeted American airstrikes to help Iraqi forces break the siege and rescue these families.  Earlier this week, one anguished Iraqi in this area cried to the world, “There is no one coming to help.”  Today, America is helping. 

The United States cannot and should not intervene every time there’s a crisis in the world.  But when there’s a situation like the one on this mountain—when countless innocent people are facing a massacre, and when we have the ability to help prevent it—the United States can’t just look away. That’s not who we are. We’re Americans.  We act.  We lead.  And that’s what we’re going to do on that mountain.  As one American who wrote to me yesterday said, “it is the right thing to do.”  

As Commander-in-Chief, I will not allow the United States to be dragged into fighting another war in Iraq.  American combat troops will not be returning to fight in Iraq, because there’s no American military solution to the larger crisis there. 

What we will do is continue our broader strategy in Iraq.  We will protect our citizens.  We will work with the international community to address this humanitarian crisis.  We’ll help prevent these terrorists from having a permanent safe haven from which to attack America.  And we’ll continue to urge Iraqi communities to reconcile, come together and fight back against these terrorists so the people of Iraq have the opportunity for a better future—the opportunity for which so many Americans gave their lives in Iraq in a long and hard war.

Today, we salute our brave men and women in uniform—especially our courageous pilots and crews over Iraq.  They’re protecting our fellow Americans.  They’re helping save the lives of innocent people on a mountain—people who today know that there’s a country called America that cares for them, too, and that is willing to stand up—not just for our own security, but for the dignity and freedom that belongs to all people. "

Lets Get Real:

President Obama made one mistake his weekly address, never say something you might not be able to follow through on, that mistake was to say that the US would not send US troops back to Iraq, the future can not be planned, a President might get a stark choice, either Iraq as an ally to the US through US ground troops or the Islamic State of Iraq with its oil.  Never, say Never. 

IS this a NEW Obama on the Middle East - Iraq Crisis

CNN - Politics: Reports the following, " The escalation marks a turning point in the Obama administration's foreign policy, which has avoided direct military involvement in Iraq and Syria until now. "

Lets Get Real:

Is this really a new Obama, will he really use the might of US power more, this crisis in Iraq is the test, if after air strikes ISIS pulls back will the Oval carry on the fight, take the fight to them, or will declare victory and leave the problem to his successor.   One has doubts that POTUS has the stomach for a long air war, and yes for victory there will have to be ground troops or least special forces.  This present crisis in Iraq will define the Obama Presidency for the last two years, does he take down ISIS or just has PR air strikes and leaves the problem to his successor, one would hope that the Oval would see the threat of ISIS and take the War to them, but for the fact that Obama has failed to act over the years, the next few days and months will be interesting to see how far POTUS goes in Iraq. 

ISIS in Iraq and World War One - Iraq Update 3 - Middle East

Telegraph - Iraq Live: Reports the following in its 1.32pm post, " ...the birth of the group's self-declared Caliphate is "the most radical change to the political geography of the Middle East since the Sykes-Picot Agreement was implemented in the aftermath of the First World War".

Lets Get Real:

ISIS is a threat to ALL Countries in the Middle East, if ISIS can move the captured weapons from Iraq to Syria it could remove the Assad Regime then use Syria and its controlled lands in Iraq to mount a threat to Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, and at the end even Israel, thus if the West has a brain cell and Obama can get over his ego this group needs to be destroyed NOW, not later, not when intelligence thinks it a threat, the Oval could not cope with Syria and Iraq under the Islamic State, it could kiss its last two years goodbye, the Islamic State would have the money and the time to cause problems for the West and the rest of the Middle East.   Thus time for the West to find its backbone and hit ISIS hard. 

Iraq Update 2 - Iraq Crisis

Guardian: Reports the following, " 20,000 Iraqis besieged by Isis escape from mountain after US air strikes "

Lets Get Real: 

This shows how air power can help in a crisis, but it won't be enough to take down ISIS, the US and the UK have to get the FACT, that sooner or later, and sooner is the likely result the West will have to send UK and US special forces back in to Iraq,   these special forces have to point out the location of ISIS and pin point them for attacking aircraft, also the West has to rebuild the Iraqi army again, also buy off those groups that are more interested in money and having a better relationship with the West.   The US can not allow Iran to come to the rescue of the Baghdad Government, that would be a nightmare for Iraq and US and cloud the Obama legacy after 2017.