Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Obama, Iran and the BOMB

Fox News: Reports that Iran could have a nuclear bomb with a year and it could have missile technology within five. One can postulate that in Israel there are already plans to take action, a nuclear armed Iran within a year is out of the question for Israel. Also the Obama Administration must know that if it allows Iran to go nuclear it will be out of office in 2012, even the 201o Mid Term Elections could come down to the fact that Obama has allowed Iran to humiliate him at every turn, the more Obama has bowed to Iran the more they have turned their heel on him ( this shows disrespect in the Middle East ), at the end of the day Obama will have to chose, does he support Israel or Iran when Israel has to take military action to protect its national security. The one Ace that Israel has and Obama cant overturn is the Israeli lobby in the US Congress, should Obama try any sanctions against Israel then the US Congress would overturn any such Act by the Oval. Interesting times ahead folks for Israel, Obama and the US Congress.

Vote Conservative on May 6th 2010



NO more NI Tax

Tax HELP for married couples

CAP on IMMIGRATION

DEFEND the UK

NO more WELFARE CULTURE

REFORM the POLITICAL SYSTEM




NYT and Iran

The New York Times: The states the following on a military solution to the problem of Iran, " As for the military options under review, we are sure that an attack would be a disaster. " The NYT is showing the same appeasement polices of the The Times of London before World War Two, at the end of the day the extreme Liberal NYT does not have the backbone to take tough military action, they see the threat but avert their eyes. Thus since President Obama follows the Agenda of the left wing NYT it is time for Israel to think about its own security, it is time for Israel to act, at the end of the day Obama will not take military action, he seems to bow to Iran but humiliates a close ally of the USA in the shape of Israel. Obama has the naivety of Carter and the hubris of Chamberlain, thus time for Israel to strike Iran, Israel does not have a friend in the Oval, its about the security of Israel at the end of the day.

LibDems and National Security

The 2nd Leaders on Sky News on Thursday is about Foreign Affairs. This could be a political minefield for the Liberal Democrats, they are extremely pro European, would jump to become part of the Euro as it goes down the toilet, they would give up our nuclear deterrence just as Iran is going nuclear, this could be a way for the Conservative Party to show that the voter has only two real options, either the Conservative Party or the Labour Party. The Shadow Foreign Secretary Mr Hague has stated the following,There appears to be complete confusion in the Liberal Democrat position on Britain’s nuclear deterrent. Today their Foreign Affairs Spokesman contradicted what their Defence Spokesman said – just two days ago – on whether we should keep a nuclear deterrent at all. On matters as important as our national security, the Liberal Democrats need to do better.” Lets see the polls for Nick Clegg after the second debate, the Conservatives should paint the LibDems as on the extreme left wing. The question will Gordon Brown agree with his friend Nick.

Welfare Reform - Conservative Agenda

BBC News: Reports on the Conservative plan to cut the costs of the welfare state, the BBC reports on a new Conservative Poster, "Let's cut benefits for those who refuse to work." David Cameron hit the right Conservative notes when it comes to welfare, Mr Cameron stated the followoing, if you refuse the first offer of a job you lose your benefits for a month, the second time for three months and then three years. This is a tough message but the right message, Mr Cameron stated the following " Conservatives will today pledge to introduce a new welfare contract by the end of 2010 – a single comprehensive Work Programme offering unprecedented support for those looking for work, combined with new sanctions for anyone who refuses to work. The new welfare contract will draw on the principles of the Big Society, backing people who do the right thing but ending the free ride for those who fail to take responsibility. The new sanctions will be introduced within six months of a Conservative Government taking office......The old way – the big government way – has failed. It’s time to tackle welfare dependency a new way – the Big Society way. We’re going to change the whole way welfare is done in this country so everyone takes responsibility and plays their part. This is our new welfare contract: do the right thing and we will back you all the way. But fail to take responsibility – and the free ride is over. " Lets be honest folks if you look at the present benefits system its in some respects better to be out of work, as the wages in black spots for employment just reach the minimum wage, the problem is that the minimum wages does not match the costs of living these days. As an example there was a job on offer in a local super store, the job was part time, thus the wage at the end of it was the same as some get from the dole. Thus why work at a dead end job if you don't have too, also lets be clear, if your a Teacher, Nurse, Doctor, etc its insulting to be offered a job you would give a 18 year old just out of College. But on the other hand this is also hubris, ( told you I understood Obama ), at least it would get you doing something, okay your older and better educated than most of the staff, in fact your older and better qualified that your boss, but at least you would gets some fresh hair, thus my point folks, sometimes the above category have to be forced to take job, ( can you see Obama and his arrogance working for minimum wage, or Gordon Brown for that matter ) but that is the political elite folks, the rest of us have to live in the real world.