The New York Times: Reports on recent comments by President Obama, he lamented that the US does not control the world, the article notes the following, " While as a statement of fact Mr. Obama’s assertion may be self-evident, it was seen by adversaries as a cop-out and even by more sympathetic analysts as a revealing moment for a president whiplashed by international instability... "
Lets Get Real:
This is what happens when you elect someone who has NEVER run even a Coffee stand as President of the United States, it has been on the job training since the first day, the important lesson is that President Obama has not the ability to understand when he is wrong, his ego is more important that the facts on the ground, he wants to please the LIBERAL base of his party at the expense of US national security. Thus if your a fair person ask yourself, would Syria, Iraq and the Ukraine be better off IF there was a different man or woman in the Oval. The answer has to be YES, from recent comments by Hillary Clinton it is clear that she would have armed the secular rebels in Syria, now that chance is lost, the main fighters in Syria now is IS. The Oval must not allow IS to control Syria and Iraq, this is a matter of US and Western national security, lets hope POTUS learns to get past his ego, and takes REAL action in the Middle East, that means ground troops, air power alone will not cut it, one is not holding one's breath that POTUS has learned that lesson.
