Liberal NATION supports SDI and Reagan

It is interesting, you can tell when Liberals think that the have to protect President Obama from his own statements, this is classic case, the new Obama nuclear plan is already seen as weak and a threat to the security of the United States. Thus what does the bible for liberals roll out, yes they know connect the Obama dream for no nukes to Reagan's same dream. Thus to protect their own weak liberal President the article states the following, ".......there is now a plausible case to be made for anti-missile defense. Reagan always insisted that his Strategic Defense Initiative program was a means toward nuclear arms cuts and ultimately the abolition of these horrific implements of mass death... " In other words folks bright liberals know that if Obama does not get re-elected all their dreams go down the toilet with his Administration. The Republicans will reverse all of Obama's domestic and international agenda, thus when Reagan starts to get support from extreme liberals the game might be up for Obama already, think how his nuclear policy will go down with middle American. In essence Obama has stated that if Iran or North Korea use terrorists thus no fingerprints to attack the US with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons the US will not take action, it will get in the lawyers to check the small print. That is why Obama will be a major loser in 2012 folks, you cant be a liberal on the domestic front and abroad, it one or another, that is the point that Obama does not get, arrogance, hubris and naivety come at a price folks, losing by 49 states could be the price that Obama has to learn, he wont like it but he might learn that he does not walk on water, its a hard lesson but it will be fun to see him learn that lesson.

The Left and Obama's Dream

Guardian: Is somewhat critical of Obama's new nuclear defence plan for no new nuclear weapons and not to use these weapons on countries should they attack the US with biological and chemical weapons, the left wing Guardian states the following, " Radical is not the word that leaps to mind reading through President Obama's long-delayed Nuclear Posture Review. ". That is the problem with the left, they don't see the threat over the hill, the Guardian would allow Iran to become a nuclear armed power, its in the same basket as the extreme liberal New York Times. The left never want to defend the USA and the UK, they argued in the 80s for the West to give up its nuclear weapons, while leaving the USSR with its nuclear force. If these people had been charge of Western security at the time of the Cold War they USSR would still be about, and Eastern Europe would be under the boot of Moscow. If you want the West to be secure it is important that Iran does not get the bomb, the lack of action by Bill Clinton and Bush 43 allowed North Korea to get the bomb and missile technology. Thus the most important national security issue facing President Obama is Iran, if he flunks Iran then Obama is just another Jimmy Carter.

Obama's Nuclear Dream and the US Senate

Newsweek: Reports on the problems that the new START nuclear Treaty could have getting passed the US Senate, the article states the following, " But it's not entirely clear that a polarized Congress will find the two-thirds majority to ratify the treaty. " The Obama dream of getting rid of nuclear weapons was supported by Ronald Reagan, but the real world is not based on the whims of an American President , even the greats such as Reagan had to see the real world. Thus when President Reagan and President Gorbachev of the USSR agreed to the abolition of all nuclear weapons there was a problem, Reagan could see beyond the his own time and the need to protect the US from future threats, Reagan would remove all nuclear weapons but he wanted a defence in case of a threat to US security. This was a deal breaker for President Gorbachev, in the end Reagan was right, the US and the West needs Anti Missile Defence shield against threats from Iran and North Korea. The difference is that Reagan did not care to be popular with the Nobel Committee, he was President of the United States, he wanted to protect the West, thus while the elite media wanted a deal at any cost, Reagan walked away. One can see Obama in the same meeting saying yes and selling out Western Security so he can be popular with the New York Times.