Ed Miliband. How about informal deal with the SNP? - 2015 Election

Guardian: Reports " Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish first minister, mentioned the possibility of a post-election arrangement with Labour ‘looser’ than a coalition "

Lets Get Real:

So Ed my mate are you going to rule out an informal deal with the SNP, the voters of the rest of the UK want to know if your willing to sell them out, anyone that can stab his brother in the back has shown that he can not be trusted, it has to be asked, would the voter, who have brothers or sisters do what Ed did to David Miliband, the former Foreign Secretary, thus ED tells us up front and before the general election will you get in to bed with the SNP.   Is power more important that the rest of the UK, we the voter have the right to know. 

Do you TRUST Ed Miliband ? Ask David - General Election 2015

BBC News: Reports " Ed Miliband has ruled out a Labour-SNP coalition in the event of a hung Parliament after May's election. "

Lets Get Real:

Voters of the UK do you trust Ed Miliband, lets look at the character of Miliband junior, he stalked the same career as his eldest brother and then stabbed him in the back to become Labour Leader.   If the polls are right the Labour Party is DEAD in Scotland, thus the will need the SNP to keep them in power, Ed " Brutus " Miliband says he will not form a coalition government with the SNP, but that does not rule out a secret deal, in that case the English, Welsh.Northern Ireland voters would pay for any concessions to the SNP, cuts in the rest of the UK but not in Scotland.  Come on Brutus, sorry Ed, will you RULE OUT ANY deal with the SNP.   Lets have the truth up front and not through secret deals. 

Arms Race in Middle East - Iran Crisis

BBC News: Reports " A senior member of the Saudi royal family has warned that a deal on Iran's nuclear programme could prompt other regional states to develop atomic fuel. "

Lets Get Real:

Thus it starts, the arms race in the Middle East. as soon as any agreement is signed that allows Iran to go nuclear the Middle East will become a vortex of deals to build nuclear structures for the anti Iran States, the Sunni States.   Lets be clear Saudi Arabia has the money to buy a nuclear missile tomorrow if it wants too.   By trying to get a deal with Iran the Oval Office under President Obama has annoyed Israel and Saudi Arabia, two close US allies.   The Obama deal with Iran is bad for the Middle East and the World, lets hope it fails, a successful deal could be more destructive that a failed bad deal. 

Oval Office, Iran vs. The US Congress - Iran Crisis

Guardian: Reports " Iran nuclear talks: White House urges Congress to stand down..Obama administration warns Republicans could ‘potentially prevent’ deal that has been years in the making and damage relations with allies across the world "

Lets Get Real:

It seems that the Oval Office and the Guardian do not understand the US Constitution, any deal between the US and Iran that is not passed by the US Congress can be over turned over by the next President.  If the POTUS wants the deal to stick he has to take it to the Congress, if he tries the UN route then the Congress could veto it anyway, US law is clear on this issue.   The Obama Oval can taste this deal, but what the Oval is not asking, is it a good deal.   The Tehran Regime can not be trusted, any deal will be a smoke screen for them to get the bomb within a few years.   The Republicans should hold their course, as a young President once said to the effect, elections have results, if you lose the Senate and the House your in trouble, the US Congress is an equal branch of Government, it would be a fool or someone who spent only a few years in the Senate to think he could go around the US Constitution.

The Whole Truth on Benghazi - Email Scandal 4- 2016 Race

Washington Post: Reports " Benghazi committee chair: No guarantee we have all Clinton e-mails we’re entitled to "

Lets Get Real:

The Democrats have to be careful, the Clintons and the truth have an odd relationship, in the case of Bill down right different from the rest of us.   The House Select Committee would not be doing its job if it just took the word of the Clintons.  Lets get real here, if it was the other way around the Democrats would be ALL OVER THIS ISSUE, its just this time its the Clintons again.   The Democrats need to be supportive as they do not have another candidate for President, but not to close in case the Clinton Campaign goes down in flames.  One can assume that the Clintons at the end of the day will be forced to hand over their private server, if its clean, then the Democrats can attack the Republicans, BUT here is the point, it has to be clean, would you bet on that when it comes to the Clintons.   Never place ALL your eggs in one basket, a basket might fall and destroy your eggs or campaign. 

Democrats vs. House Select Committee on Libya - Email Scandal 3

Fox News: Reports " Gowdy denies Benghazi panel created to thwart Hillary Clinton's 2016 bid  "

Lets Get Real:

The Democrats have gotten their knickers in a right twist, the Republican House Select Committee should play the LONG GAME, it should drag out the process, it should not rush to get the Clinton server, it works for the Republicans that the Clinton Camp is holding on to the server, very Richard Nixon.    The Select Committee should call Secretary Clinton at the end of the year, make it last a few days, keep the questions narrow and to the point, ALL about LIBYA and the private Server.   The Democrats want to protect their candidate no matter the cost to the US or the voter.   Time for the Republicans to play hardball, the Chicago way. 

NYT Hates the Clintons - Email Scandal Part 2 - 2016 Race

The New York Times: Ms Dowd writes the following open letter to Hillary Clinton, here is a great quote, " Hillary, your syndrome is less mortal, more regal, a matter of “What Is Hillary Owed?” Ronald Reagan seemed like an ancient king, as one aide put it, gliding across the landscape. You seem like an annoyed queen, radiating irritation at anyone who tries to hold you accountable. You’re less rhetorically talented than Bill but more controlling,.. "

Lets Get Real:

The uber liberal NYT does not like the Clintons, it really wants another Obama, well that is not on the cards, so while the NYT will support Hillary Clinton if she gets the nomination its not based love in the heart, it based on the readership of the NYT being liberal and thus there is no else to support.   The Clintons really need to get their act together, this blog has made it clear if the Republicans do not nominate Jeb Bush it will support Hillary Clinton, but and here is the but, the Clintons have to learn that the rules that run every other person also falls on them.   The Clintons play word games and think because they are liberal, as the article notes they can do what ever they like, well sorry to upset them but they are like the rest of us poor plebs, there should not be different rules for the rich and powerful.    It will be interesting to see how the Clintons get out of this mess without turning over their private server.