What Middle Peace TALKS,? The Hubris of Secretary Kerry

Telegraph: Reports the following from the Israeli and Palestinian talks, " Middle East peace talks: both sides warn process is on the edge of collapse...Israeli official close to the talks says that even US secretary of state John Kerry, its tireless sponsor, was cooling off ".

Lets Get Real:

This was always the end result, the Palestinians want a REAL State, and they want the right of return to those that left Israel, a real STATE would be a constant threat to Israel, the Israeli people want a PEACE, but they firstly they want Israel to remain a Jewish State.   If you had a REAL Palestinian State it would have control of its air and ground space, this would be an open invite for terrorists to attack Israel, also if Arabs had a right of return they would over time outnumber those of Jewish decent, after World War 2 Israel is never going to allow Jews to become a  minority in their own State.   Every US Administration thinks it has a solution to the conflict in the Middle East, to be fair President Clinton go close in 2000, but the Palestinian leaders refused to take the best deal they were offered, that deal is not coming back soon.   Thus we have to wait three more years to see what a new US Administration bring to the Table. 

Ukrainian Officer KILLED in the Crimea - Ukraine Crisis Latest 2

Guardian:  Reports the following from the Ukraine, " Naval officer dies after altercation in Novofyodorovka as prime minister accuses Russia of trying to destabilise eastern Ukraine ".

Lets Get Real:

Thus the pawns have been set in motion by Moscow, you have the unrest in the East of Ukraine, pro Russians protesters with guns, you have this death in the Crimea that will cause concern in Kiev, on the whole the Kiev Government has been passive, it has not risen to the bait of the Russians, one can assume that this is because of pressure from the Oval Office and the EU, but how long can Kiev do nothing when it comes to the Eastern Ukraine, it has to make sure on the ground that the East does not fall to the pro Russian protesters with guns, thus the Army of the Ukraine might have to make some movement to defend those that are loyal to the new Government in Kiev.    As stated you can not keep between forty and eighty thousands troops on standby for action for days and weeks on end, they become restive and can cause you more problems if you decide to take action, thus watch the news over the next few days, the Russian Bear might have woken up. 

Is Russia ready to invade the Ukraine ? - Ukraine Crisis Latest

BBC News: Reports the following from Eastern Ukraine, " Pro-Russian activists in eastern Ukraine have seized state security buildings in the cities of Donetsk and Luhansk, Ukrainian officials say.....in Luhansk the protesters have raided the arsenal in the security building. ".

Lets Get Real:

These raids have the feel of a long term plan created in Moscow, the Luhansk attack could be the key, the protesters have gotten weapons, thus the new Kiev Government might have to send in forces to keep the City under Kiev control, this could be the provocation that Moscow needs to send its troops in to Eastern Ukraine, even go for total control of the Ukraine.    The Russians have forty thousand troops on alert on the Russian and Ukraine border, this presence and alert status can not be kept on forever, thus within days you could see an invasion of the entire Ukraine. 

What GAME is Iran playing? - Obama's 2nd Term Blues

BBC News: Reports on Iran's new nomination for its UN post in New York, " The Obama administration says Iran's nomination of a former hostage-taker as its ambassador to the United Nations is "extremely troubling".

Lets Get Real:

This move by Tehran is a REAL kick in the teeth for President Obama, since coming in to Oval Office in 2009 the Oval has tried to develop talks with Iran over its nuclear ambitions, the latest talks are not seen as having a great chance of success, this move by Tehran could be a way out for the Government of Iran, if Obama gives the green light the right and even some Democrats will jump on him, he could even be in pictures with the UN Ambassador from Iran, the rawness of the hostage crisis that took down the Carer Presidency has not be forgotten in the US, if the Oval Office says NO, then Iran can say that the talks have failed due to the actions of the Americans.   One has to assume that Tehran must have known that the history of their nominee would come to light, while at the same time having talks with the US about a final deal, there have been reports that the Conservatives in Iran have told their new President that either he gets a deal that benefits Iran or he is out of office.   Any deal that allows Iran to get near to becoming a nuclear power will not be approved either by the US Senate or Israel, a treaty or agreement could lead to Israeli striking Iran with all its power, thus in a sense this move by Tehran might be the straw that breaks the Treaty, various sides have an interest outside the main players in making this deal fail, the Conservatives in Iran who do not want a better relationship with the West and Israel and its supporters, yes this blog, who see any DEAL as another Munich 1938, the real world is raw, brutal and not for the faint hearted.  

Free Speech and Money - Obama's 2nd Term Blues

The New York Times: Has the following editorial comment on the latest Judgement by the US Supreme Court on how much individual Americans can spend overall in an election cycle, from candidates to pressure groups, " The Supreme Court on Wednesday continued its crusade to knock down all barriers to the distorting power of money on American elections....court’s campaign-finance rulings have determinedly eaten away at the court’s own precedents and decades of anticorruption efforts by members of Congress.. ".

Lets Get Real:

This is typical of the liberal NYT, when it Unions or rich left wing Americans giving money the uber liberal NYT tends to be quiet, when the US Supreme Court wants to allow Americans to decide how much they spend the liberal elite press goes crazy, it all right for uber left wing rich people or Unions to fund their pet projects but the idea that the right should have the same right sends the left up the wall.   The NYT still thinks its the 1970s after Watergate, WELL WAKE UP its the 21 Century, things might have changed since the time of Richard Nixon.   The US Supreme Court was right to reduce the red tape,  it should go further, there should be NO Limits on how much an individual or company gives to a political candidate, its a matter of free speech, its the FREE part that the NYT is missing, not new, they covered for Stalin and still release secret files that damage US national interests. 

7 Million sing up for ObamaCare - REALLY? Do you trust the Obama Admin

The Hill: Reports the following from the Obama White House, " More than seven million people enrolled in ObamaCare by the March 31 deadline, topping the White House's initial goal, the administration said Monday. ".

Lets Get Real:

If you TRUST the Obama White House you need your right to VOTE taken away, those that trust the Obama White House are the same people who believe EVERY lie this Administration has stated, from Libya to the IRS scandal.   So questions to these CRAZY liberals and the elite media that kisses the backside of President Obama. 

1. How many of those enrolled in ObamaCare have paid.

2. Will the insurance companies need a bailout, if so do voters want to bailout ObamaCare and the Democratic Party.

3. How many of those that enrolled in ObamaCare had a plan before it was taken away by ObamaCare.

4. How many young and healthy have signed up, the con scheme that is ObamaCare only works if there are more young and health people than older people who are ill.

5. How many people have asked and being granted an exception, due to hardship, and this term NOW is very liberal, watching paint dry counts, in bed asleep, etc, thus do not have to pay a penalty.

6. How many people will be charged by the IRS for failing to get ObamaCare,? What is the cost of the IRS chasing people.

Those questions should be enough to keep Democrats worried right up in till November 2014, elections have results, lets hope for a Republican House and Senate and a Republican President in 2016. 

Did Torture WORK after 9/11 - Bush 43 Years

Telegraph: Reports the following from Capital Hill, " 'Torture was not essential to find bin Laden’, US Senate report will find..A still-secret US Senate report into the use of “enhanced interrogations” in the wake of 9/11 will find that torture was not necessary or effective, it has been claimed ".

Lets Get Real:

As the Democrats have a majority on the US Senate Committee it is in their interest to get this out before the 2014 Mid Terms, it will be used to get the base out, make the Bush 43 public enemy No1 for liberals and those on the extreme left.   The question everyone should ask is after 9/11 would you have wanted President Obama charge, Bush 43 prevented further attacks on the US, while President Obama has had the Boston bombings and the deaths in Libya.   The left when it fears election disaster always goes left, the point they fail to get is that torture works, everyone breaks, if you want to be defended you vote Republican, never for A Democrat.