The New York Times: Has the following editorial comment on the latest Judgement by the US Supreme Court on how much individual Americans can spend overall in an election cycle, from candidates to pressure groups, " The Supreme Court on Wednesday continued its crusade to knock down all barriers to the distorting power of money on American elections....court’s campaign-finance rulings have determinedly eaten away at the court’s own precedents and decades of anticorruption efforts by members of Congress.. ".
Lets Get Real:
This is typical of the liberal NYT, when it Unions or rich left wing Americans giving money the uber liberal NYT tends to be quiet, when the US Supreme Court wants to allow Americans to decide how much they spend the liberal elite press goes crazy, it all right for uber left wing rich people or Unions to fund their pet projects but the idea that the right should have the same right sends the left up the wall. The NYT still thinks its the 1970s after Watergate, WELL WAKE UP its the 21 Century, things might have changed since the time of Richard Nixon. The US Supreme Court was right to reduce the red tape, it should go further, there should be NO Limits on how much an individual or company gives to a political candidate, its a matter of free speech, its the FREE part that the NYT is missing, not new, they covered for Stalin and still release secret files that damage US national interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment