The Times: Reports that in the past two months, the West has lost more troops in Afghanistan than in Iraq. Afghanistan was the base for those that attacked the USA on 9/11 and Pakistan was the base for those that attacked London on 7/7. The history of dealing with Afghanistan and Pakistan in the border areas is not good, even at the height of the British Empire both places had troubling hot spots. The policy makers need to come up with a new policy, the terrorists in Afghanistan have learned from their fellow terrorists in Iraq, they changed their tactics thus we have more bombs and suicide bombers. Is the West ready to make a thirty or forty year commitment to Afghanistan, I have my doubts, we need new ideas and policies we cant give up, what happened on 9/11 and 7/7 shows the failure not to take an interest in the area after forcing the USSR out in 1988. This is going to be a long and bloody war.
A look at the Politics of the United States and the UK. The Foreign Policies of both countries and how they behave in the International Community.
Thursday, July 03, 2008
Deaths in Afghanistan
The Times: Reports that in the past two months, the West has lost more troops in Afghanistan than in Iraq. Afghanistan was the base for those that attacked the USA on 9/11 and Pakistan was the base for those that attacked London on 7/7. The history of dealing with Afghanistan and Pakistan in the border areas is not good, even at the height of the British Empire both places had troubling hot spots. The policy makers need to come up with a new policy, the terrorists in Afghanistan have learned from their fellow terrorists in Iraq, they changed their tactics thus we have more bombs and suicide bombers. Is the West ready to make a thirty or forty year commitment to Afghanistan, I have my doubts, we need new ideas and policies we cant give up, what happened on 9/11 and 7/7 shows the failure not to take an interest in the area after forcing the USSR out in 1988. This is going to be a long and bloody war.
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Obama and the Liberal Left
New York Times: Reports that the LIBERAL LEFT is not happy with Obama for his support of wiretapping and the grant of immunity to the telephone companies. This move shows Obama in a good light, moving to the centre, the LIBERAL LEFT are crackpots, I would not trust them to take my dog for a walk never mind the security of the United States. Obama is showing political courage, the security of the USA is more important than the loony views of the Left wing of the Democratic Base. This shows Obama is a real and realistic politician if he had kept his word to oppose the agreement between the President and Congress this could have been used against him in the General Election.
The Polls
As stated in the past the Polls in June are quite suspect, but that's what we have as Empirical Information. Lets have a look at the latest polls.
Gallup: Has the race close, Obama 46% - McCain 44%. As Gallup states Obama after winning the nomination and the meet with Clinton gets a bounce but he cant build on that bounce in the polls. It should be recalled Senator Kerry managed to get a negative bounce from his convention. It could be argued that this will place pressure on Obama to name Hillary Clinton as his VP. I know he cant stand the Clintons but this is politics, after winning he can move her to the across the street from the White House. As for Bill Clinton appoint him Ambassador to the Falklands, even he cant cause trouble there, its full of Penguins.
CNN: Has a interesting Poll, it looks at the Obama / McCain match up but also looks at the race with third party candidates. I discount this second Poll with third party candidates. Thus lets look at the fight between Obama and McCain. In this poll Obama has a five point lead that would match previous polls, Obama 50% - McCain 45%. Thus we have a very close race, as stated in the past a close race does not help Obama, if he cant win now with all the bad domestic news he cant win period.
Israel and Iran
World Tribune: Reports that Israel has no plans to attack Iran in 2008. If your the Government of Israel its the kind of message you would send, it will cause confusion in Iran, it will make West place more pressure on Iran, as they now know that Israel will take action and you could get the price of Oil going to between 250 -300 Dollars. The Western is heading in to recession, a block in Oil could see the West go in to Depression. I still think Israel will hit Iran before the end of 2008.
Tuesday, July 01, 2008
Lines in the Sand ! - ABC News
ABC News: Reports on what could trigger a attack on Iran by Israel. The triggers would be that Iran was close to getting the bomb and or that there defence build up could hurt Israel should it attack Iran. Thus expect Israel to attack Iran just after the November Presidential Election, with the condition that Obama wins, Obama is seen as weak by Israel. On the other hand if McCain should win, Israel could wait for a few months. But should Obam win expect a heavy attack between November - January 2009. That Iran will attack Iraq, the USA will have to deal with a regional war. Iran will try to cut off the oil to the West, expect the ships to be targets of attack. The price of Oil could reach two hundred and fifty dollars. The UK press is sleep walking, they will only report this story when we have a WAR in the Middle East.
Obama Ad to Reagan Democrats
Good 2nd General Election Ad by Obama. This should appeal to Reagan Democrats. Good move to the centre.
Lisbon Treaty
BBC News: Reports that the President of Poland has refused to sign the Lisbon Treaty in to law. All I can say is good for Poland. The Lisbon Treaty is dead, only the elite political class are drunk on the EU. It is time the UK had a vote on the Lisbon Treaty.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)