Wiretap Approved by Congress - Media Review

Washington Post: Article looks at the view held by the Democrats on the Hill that they had been pushed in to approving the Wiretap as they did not want the blame should a terrorists hit while they are on Holiday.

Roll Call: Raw Results.

Protect America Act: Yes 227 - N0 183.

Liberals on Iraq

The Weekly Standard : A very interesting article by William Kristol on how Liberal Media and politicians have jumped the gun on Iraq and seeing a fault line are coming back to some central ground. Lets Hope its good news in September or those that supported the war might have trouble in defending further action there in the future.

Iowa Poll

A new poll from Iowa. Very interesting, Obama ahead of Clinton, Clinton and Edwards are tied.

ABC NEWS/Washington Post: PDF Required.

Obama 27 %

Clinton 26 %

Edwards 26 %

If Views was in charge of the Clinton Campaign he would have the Senator out in Iowa ever weekend and every other day, she can not afford for Obama to win Iowa, NH would be very attractive for Obama to win next and then the nomination.

A Sham House

The problem with thinking you are always right, does not matter if your a Democratic or Republican is that you think after a time the rules don't apply to you. This week we saw that the Democrats think only of ends not means. They lost a vote on the House floor, what did the Democrats do, take it as part of the Democratic Process, yes that will be the day, they had another vote and got what they wanted. The Republicans smelled a rat and a investigation is taking place, the Post writes the following, " Such powerful investigative committees are usually reserved for issues such as the Watergate scandal and the funneling of profits from Iranian arms sales to the Nicaraguan contras in the 1980s. " It can be argued that because the Democrats have failed to get major issues passed such as Iraq they are forced to play dirty pool, they have to bring home the bacon to the base, but are they making the same mistakes the Republicans did when they had the power.

Liberal Left and Terror

NYT: In between the lines it can be seen that the NYT is not happy that the Congress has passed a bill that will help the government when it comes to national security.

Democratic Credit on National Security

On the whole it can be argued that the Democratic Party has a hill to climb when in comes to the issue of National Security. But this time the Congress has passed a Bill that will help the US Government go after Terrorists over the water. The Bill allows the US Government to listen to communication that goes through the USA but connects people in different countries.

Obama's Path?

A recent Foreign Policy Speech ( pdf required ) by Senator Obama has raised a few eyebrows in the Beltway on the one hand hawkish and dovish, does reality of the world effect Presidential politics.

Roll Call : Obama has called for troops to be sent in to Pakistan to chase after Terrorists who struck on the USA on 9/11 on the other hand he wants to talk to to Iran and others. The article states the following, " Obama clearly means to be the torchbearer for a new generation. But America also needs a president with the experience to avoid a Bay of Pigs, a Vietnam or an Iraq War. " In the article the actions of past Presidents are looked at how they had negative and positive effects. Thus JFK and his polices to the USSR and how this effected Cuba, Reagan and his tough policy towards the USSR. I think the Beltway Press are a missing a basic point, Obama has to win the Democratic Nomination, these early stages are about the base, moving to the Centre comes later in the process. If Obama can win the Nomination he is clever enough to move to the centre early next year.

Chicago Sun - Times: On his speech Obama is getting attacked by his Democratic Opponents and from the White House. On the Democratic Side for being hawkish, troops in to Pakistan and from the White House for not being a Liberal, the respect for International Law and the Sovereignty of Pakistan. Obama might be on the right track, attacked from both sides about the speech.

New York Post: The article points out that Obama is not stating a new plan, the article states the following, " First, there was little new in Obama's proposition for fighting al Qaeda. In fact, he might be alarmed to learn that he's basically taken a long-standing page from the Bush administration's playbook in the War on Terror. " Also an attack without the green light from the government of Pakistan could cause major problems even lead to its fall.

Pakistan is a Nuclear Power, what if terrorists get hold of them, this would bring in India, also a nuclear power. The article states that all opitions should be on the table but we need the government of Pakistan to work with the West. Politics is 24/7 and different candidates have different ideas that is the point of politics, but politicians from both USA parties have to make sure that their plans and their rheotric does not have a long term negative effect on the American Foreign Policy. Obama who could became the next President could find himself boxed in by his own words. What if a few years down the line he is President and he is told that UBL in found and he needs to send in the troops, what if he cant, his words could be used to attack him when he would face re - election in 2012.

Washington Post : The article looks the political conflict between Obama and Clinton. The past versus the Future.