Is Obama a Socialist ?

Listen to this Radio Recording and tell me Obama is not a Socialist. Spread the Wealth, Redistribution of Wealth, does Obama really want the American Dream or does he want to turn the United States in to Cuba, France would be bad but it sounds like the thing Castor would say in a rational manner.

The Five Point Win for Obama ?

Lets have a look at the polls that give Obama a four to five point win over McCain.

Rasmussen: Reports in their Tracking Poll that Obama still has a five point lead over McCain. The poll finds the following, Obama 51% - McCain 46%. It is interesting, this is close to my own prediction of the final result, Obama 53% - McCain 47%. If Obama can win by five points and have a Democratic Congress he can push his Liberal Agenda through. If the USA voter elects Obama President and they find their taxes go up and those that want to make money find they are fined for wanting to be rich then the USA will become the Sick Man of the Western System. Do the American people want to be liked that much by France ?

Gallup: Also reports a five – point lead for Obama,in their poll finds the following, Obama 50% - McCain 45%. Gallup points out that both Ronald Reagan and Al Gore both came back in the last week, one to win the other to win the popular vote. It would be amusing after all the talk how Obama has bought in new voters if McCain was to win the popular vote but lose the Electoral College. It would be the reverse of 2000. It would make for an interesting Obama Administration, he could either govern from the centre or like Bush 43 push his Agenda, it’s the winning that counts not how at end of the day.

Zogby: Reports a five - point race, Obama 50% - McCain 45%. The race has become closer but in less Obama really messes up over the next few days he will win big. Also he should have long coattails to make sure he has a majority in both the House and the Senate. Folks expect those taxes to go up big time.

Terrorists ATTACKED in SYRIA

Fox News: Reports that the USA attacked a terrorist hideout in Syria. What about attacking Iran, a quick and heavy attack on Iran's nuclear facilities would send a message to Iran and Syria and would also bind the next Obama Administration. President George W. Bush has to set the field for the Obama Administration, if he was to attack Iran, there is no way Obama could leave Iraq. Lets recall Bush 41 and his sending of troops in to Somalia, if Obama finds himself in low level war with Iran he cant appease Iran in first days as President and he would not be able to leave Iraq. Does Bush 43 have the nerve to configure the future for Obama.

Liberal Slant on Syria

The New York Times: As you would expect from the left liberal New York Times, when reporting from Iraq it cant help itself, it does not mention that the reason that the USA might have attacked Syria is because it is allowing terrorists to come over the border in to Iraq. What does the left liberal New York Times go on about, it attacks an agreement that would allow the USA to stay in Iraq after the new year, it states the following about the agreement between the USA and Iraq, " The pact faces strenuous opposition from neighboring countries, especially Syria and Iran, because of fears that the United States might use Iraqi territory to carry out attacks on them. " What about the threat to Western Troops in Iraq from terrorists coming over the border form Syria and Iran. The Times is so Anti - American it cant see beyond its own Agenda. The terrorist attack of 9/11 seems to have passed the left liberal Times, it is more concerned about the welfare of Syria and Iran than the Democratic interests of the West. I guess when the Gray Lady fell she had to fall in to the gutter. No wonder her profits are down, next year they will be kissing the backside of Obama, who will they be critical off, the power will be in the hands of Liberals, Presidency and Congress.

A Nuclear Syria ?

BBC News: Has more on the USA attack on Syria, it seems it was more than just an air attack, troops landed. Why would the USA land troops in Syria of all places, would assume that if Syria has hideout for terrorist than a air attack would do the job. Lets recall that Israel attacked Syria because it was building a nuclear structure. Is the United States concerned that that Syria has not learnt it lesson and wants to become a nuclear power. What kind of building was invaded, was a terrorist hideout or something more, this story has legs, the Syrian propaganda can be discounted, either the USA was clearing house of terrorists or the building has more importance than it seems at the present.

No Election ?

The Sunday Times: Great article on those that follow the USA election in detail! Ask what will they do after November 4 2008. Its simple, the election for 2008 started two years early, thus expect the runners to start to visit Iowa after the Obama Inauguration. Iowa and New Hampshire will be back in the spotlight. Also we have the Mid Terms in 2010 to look forward to, should be a real fight, Obama will be have served for two years, if Taxes go up expect Republicans to retake the House and Senate. November 4th is just end of this cycle, elections, polls, articles about 2012 will start in the new year, if Obama looks like a loser in 2012 will Hillary Clinton run against him aka Ronald Reagan in 1976. 2012 Start here.

USA ATTACKING SYRIA

Fox News: Reports that the USA is attacking targets inside Syria. If true, has Bush decided that Obama is going to win thus he is going to force him to accept the War in Iraq if he likes it not. A cross border attack would need the highest authority at least the Secretary of Defence or the President. This just could be a one off attack, depends what Syria does, well not a lot Syria can do, could this be a October surprise or just a story that will fade away, very interesting development.