The Hill: Reports the House Republicans have found the following when looking at the role of Secretary Clinton in the Benghazi scandal, " ..the House Oversight panel are also expected to say the then-secretary of State was personally involved in the decision to depict the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans as something other than terrorism. ".
Lets Get Real:
The Democrats say is ALL political, that is true, that does not mean its not true, one has to recall that the deaths in Libya came at a bad time for the Obama election team in 2012, one can postulate that the political side of the team wanted a quick spin out there that kept to the message that Al Qaeda was dead and that Obama had saved the US Car industry, that can be the only reason that the White House whitewashed the talking points for the Sunday political shows, then needed time, in till Obama got his 2nd term. In many respects like Nixon and Watergate. That would be low politics but not illegal, if every politicians was charged with spin the system would fall apart, if it was a White House whitewash all it would take would be a sorry, and few sackings on the political side, someone down the food chain would have to take the fall for the Oval, it has happened before folks, but that is not the problem. The problem is why the Oval did not send in forces to protect the US compound in Benghazi, WHO said NO, who allowed four Americans to die without taking action, that is the problem folks. It has been noted that there is no timeline for the movements of the Oval at these critical times, how much did the Oval have to say about that night, and since the deaths why no one has been arrested, that is the problem folks, and thus feeds in to the talking points. There might not be a there there folks, no scandal, the problem is that the Oval is acting like its has something to hide, lets see if Libya is another Watergate folks.
PS. Thus far no articles on the BBC, Guardian or Telegraph. WONDER WHY!
No comments:
Post a Comment