The New York Times: An interesting editorial by the liberal New York Times, in its hubris view the vote in Mass was not a "..national referendum on health care reform — even though it has upended the effort to pass a reform bill,....". If the vote in Mass was not a referendum on health care reform how come that is the main casualty is health care reform, the Editorial board of the liberal NYT needs to smell the coffee, the above is a contradiction. Even the Oval has seen the light at know wants a health care reform agreement that takes in Republican votes. The problem is you know have a bill that is a orphan in political terms, the Senate does not want it back, the House does not want to vote on it, the members even Liberals see the light. Thus it is like when you dump a boyfriend or girlfriend, you can dump them and never speak to them again, and you don’t have to say why, if they seek answers they are stalkers. In the case of health care reform the stalkers are the elite media, they will not allow the Democrats to bin in their view a great bill without a lot of public shame, thus an orphan bill that everyone wants to dump but they are in the glare of the press. Those Olympic Gods are good when they see hubris in the Oval.
No comments:
Post a Comment