The New York Times: The liberl Ms Dowd writes the following on the Benghazi scandal, " In the midst of a re-election campaign, Obama aides wanted to promote the mythology that the president who killed Osama was vanquishing terror. So they deemed it problematic to mention any possible Qaeda involvement in the Benghazi attack. ".
Lets Get Real:
Thus folks if you follow the above logic the next question that has to be asked, how much did the Oval know about the whitewashing of the talking points after Benghazi, did the Oval or the White House place pressure on the CIA or Hillary Clinton to follow the party line, did the Oval okay the laying to the US voter before the Presidential Election about what happened in Libya, when the President on down for weeks stressed the vile video how out of touch with the truth were they, or did they know the truth and lie anyway, it can be stated that the Oval and State, e.g Obama and Clinton lied to the families of those Americans killed in Libya, they stated face to face to these families that their loved ones died due to vile video, that was not true and they knew it, thus the Oval should be humble, say SORRY, take the blame, as Reagan did over Iran - Contra and move on, the shine has gone off the Obama Presidency some time ago, but like Reagan, President Obama can get enough back if he is honest with the US voter. The Oval does not have all the time in the world, in this 24/7 news world if there are other scandals they will come out, get ahead of them NOW, otherwise it it will be a long 2nd term and cold.
No comments:
Post a Comment