The New York Times: Has this its editorial on the Benghazi talking points, the NYT states the following, " ..they have become a major political issue in large part because of the White House’s inept response to questions about how they were written. ".
Lets Get Real:
Even the liberal NYT has to revere course after stating there was not there there to the Libyan terror attacks, although the above is critical of the Obama White House the rest of the article is an attack on the Republicans, but with the following exception, is the NYT throwing Hillary Clinton under the bus, read this folks, and think, " It was surprising that the board did not question Mrs. Clinton or her two top deputies because...the board concluded mistakes were made by less senior officials. ". Folks you do not have to be a Time Lord to work out that that the NYT has decided someone has to take the political fall for Benghazi, it could never be President Obama, thus you have Hillary Clinton, do not be surprised it you start to see articles suggesting that Hillary Clinton might like to become a US Ambassador in the UK or France, yes folks getting her abroad and out of the 2016 race, that is how the game is played. As the last post showed the White House or someone in the WH was trying to place the blame for the talking points at the feet of Hillary Clinton, guess who is being set up to take the fall folks, wonder who VP Biden has been talking too, but that would be speculation folks, interesting speculation.
No comments:
Post a Comment