Obama vs NYT

The New York Times: Has a harsh word for President Obama and the Obama Administration when it comes to the oil spill, the NYT states the following, " Mr. Obama and his team will have to follow through — with more energy and dedication than they have shown so far. ". Even the bloated and Liberal New York Times might be getting the fact that rhetoric and being the first African - President does not mean you get let off the rules of the political world, one has to wonder how many rows it took to get this kind of tough editorial out of the liberal NYT. It can be argued that the NYT has a paternal racist streak, it has gone out of its way not to attack Obama, he is their candidate, he represents their extreme liberal Agenda, but the problem is that President Obama might not be up to the job, he has never run a business, spent his life in state or Federal office, one can argue that he would not get LBJ's staff due to his lack of experience of the real world, as to real world this is the political world, working in the community does not mean you can cope with Iran,North Korea or a oil spill. What must drive the NYT around the bend is that POTUS will lose re-election in 2012 and then get Republican rule for a generation, there is an old saying, be careful what you wish for, you just might get it, for the NYT could be Obama and his destruction of the Democratic Party. As stated many times in this blog, Obama could have been a contender, up there with JFK and Reagan but he allowed his own arrogance to get in his way, in many respects another Richard Nixon.