The New York Times: Reports that President Obama has had limited success at the NATO meeting, NATO has agreed to a limited and short surge for the Presidential Election in Afghanistan, the Liberal NYT writes the following, " ....European leaders offered few extra troops.... with most of the soldiers only on temporary security assignment, underlining deep divisions within the alliance over the war. " Thus it has been reported by Fox News and NYT that President Obama failed to meet his agenda. The President is good at spinning, that why he won the election, but lets see if the short and limited deployment actual happens, what these new soldiers will do, will they fight or with they be in the North, will they act like policemen not soldiers. The UK forces will fight, they are need in the South, it is expected that the Taliban/Terrorists will try to disturb the election in August. As stated before, the War in Afghanistan is Obama's War, he doubling the troops, he is nation building. Afghanistan is the last place for this kind of woolly liberalism. Its going to cost the USA and the UK, lets hope at the end of the day we kind find a honourable exit, don't fancy a repeat of the 19th Century result of the first British - Afghanistan War.
No comments:
Post a Comment