Guardian: Reports on how the Obama Oval defines those that are to be killed by drones, the articles notes the following, " defines a militant as any military-age male in the strike zone when its drone attacks. ".
Lets Get Real:
This blog does not have a problem with the use of drones as a form of assassination, its clean and effective, no troops on the ground, thus no US or UK Armed Forces Personnel getting killed. On the other hand Obama's hiking of drone use makes Bush 43 look like a liberal. While the Bush Oval used torture on terrorists they didn't kill them, also got good information out of them and threw them in to jail and threw away the key, also a good move. The leak of the fact that POTUS himself has the final say on those that are killed is a mistake, there have been cases were innocent people have been killed. One can assume that the Nobel Prize Committee has a letter in the post asking for their price back and the money. The uberal liberal forget that President Obama is a Chicago Pol, they are bloody ruthless in many ways, Obama has upgraded the drone strikes because he is afraid that if he didn't and something happened he would get the blame. Thus folks your asking what is the solution, Pakistan has showed its not a ally of the US, the badlands of the Pakistan and Afghan border has major terrorists havens, the Oval has no choice if it wants out of Afghanistan by 2014 but to carry on with these strikes, context means that Obama is doing the right thing, its ruthless and bloody folks, the NATO allies want out of Afghanistan, thus in this case the President should get support from the right and cover. Sooner or later the left will really turn on him, one can see the day that the issue will be before the US Supreme Court. Lets hope the Court supports Obama's kill list.
No comments:
Post a Comment