Not WW3 ?

New York Times: Interesting article in the NYT on the reaction to the view in the White House that a Nuclear Armed Iran could lead to WW3. The paper of record takes a different view, its shows a picture from a seminal American TV movie, The Day after, done in the mid 80s to show the USA after a War. Ironic it was shown here in the UK on the Sci- Fi Channel. The paper of record sees it as " more like chess " game within the context of the USA and Russian relationship. That's the problem with the New York Times, it sees what it wants to see, this hard ball politics, its a chess game yes but the object of the game is to prevent a nuclear armed Iran. If Diplomacy fails and it will, the games will end and the West will have to hit Iran hard. The winner can only be the West, nothing less would be a victory for Iran, and we are back to the 1930s again, then Israel would have to hit Iran from the Air, and if that happens that could cause havoc in the Middle East. The West, UK, USA and France must act to protect the national security of the West.

Iran Threat ?

Sunday Times ( UK ): A very interesting article in the Sunday Times, the heating up of the forth coming confrontation with Iran. The Paper states the following, " BRITISH special forces have crossed into Iran several times in recent months as part of a secret border war against the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s Al-Quds special forces. " It can be formulated that a attack on Iran will occur within a year, Iran is not willing to give up its development of a nuclear weapon, its a threat to Western interests in Iraq and Afghanistan. The time for Diplomacy is not long, if the government in Iran wont change its policy and the people are to afraid to take action the UK and the USA and even France will have to hit Iran hard from the air. The Special forces of the West should be in Iran NOW, they should use the time to create resistance networks within the country, scout for sites that have nuclear development, also if possible disturb the civic structure and economy, or least have plans to act if the order should come. THE ORDER WILL COME THAT IS THE SAD PART.

Afghanistan Troops

BBC: Reports that the UK might send more troops to Afghanistan, this is not a good idea, my views on our deployment in Afghanistan is on record. What about our NATO allies, its about time they spent their treasure in Forces and Money. Troops in to Iraq yes, not to Afghanistan. Nice people on the whole but they don't like foreign troops on their soil for a long time.

World War Three ?

Presidential Press Conference 17/10/07

The Elite Media has started to go wild, President George W. Bush stated that if Iran had the bomb then World Wart Three was a threat, thus a Nuclear Iran had to be stopped. Here is the full question and answer.

Q: But you definitively believe Iran wants to build a nuclear weapon?

THE PRESIDENT: I think so long -- until they suspend and/or make it clear that they -- that their statements aren't real, yeah, I believe they want to have the capacity, the knowledge, in order to make a nuclear weapon. And I know it's in the world's interest to prevent them from doing so. I believe that the Iranian -- if Iran had a nuclear weapon, it would be a dangerous threat to world peace.

But this -- we got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel. So I've told people that if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon. I take the threat of Iran with a nuclear weapon very seriously. And we'll continue to work with all nations about the seriousness of this threat. Plus we'll continue working the financial measures that we're in the process of doing. In other words, I think -- the whole strategy is, is that at some point in time, leaders or responsible folks inside of Iran may get tired of isolation and say, this isn't worth it. And to me, it's worth the effort to keep the pressure on this government.

And secondly, it's important for the Iranian people to know we harbor no resentment to them. We're disappointed in the Iranian government's actions, as should they be. Inflation is way too high; isolation is causing economic pain. This is a country that has got a much better future, people have got a much better -- should have better hope inside Iran than this current government is providing them.

So it's -- look, it's a complex issue, no question about it. But my intent is to continue to rally the world to send a focused signal to the Iranian government that we will continue to work to isolate you, in the hopes that at some point in time, somebody else shows up and says it's not worth the isolation.

I still think the Bush Administration after diplomacy fails and it will fail will hit Iran hard but only by air power before the election. This would be a very wise move, the next administration might not have the will to act when it comes to Iran.

New A.G

Washington Post: Then WP is following the New York Times Liberal line when it comes to the law and terrorism. The hearings for the New Attorney General have began, they want promises on issues that will be around for years.

Libeals are worried?

The New York Observer: New York Liberals are worried, interesting article in the Observer, all the old Giuliani enemies are out to attack. The point he won in New York City, and his successor was a Republican for a time. The article states the following from the left in New York, " Mr. Giuliani’s detractors lament that his strong showing is a freakish anomaly caused by the overall weakness of the Republican field. " The other argument being of course that Giuliani is a strong candidate. Of course if Giuliani can put New York in play during the election then Hillary Clinton will have to spend money to secure her own state, let the fun begin...

Ronald Reagan Crown ?

President Ronald Reagan left office on the 20 January 1989, he died in 2004 after a long illness when kept him out of public view. In 2007 we have a debate between Senator Obama and Mayor Giuliani, a Democrat and a Republican as to whom the Reagan Crown should go to. There was only one Ronald Reagan, but these two have some of his qualities. The one quality they need to show is winning.