The New York Times: Reports that a meeting between the prospective next US Secretary of State, the US UN Ambassador Susan Rice and Republican Senators, it was not positive, the article notes the following, " ..attested to the bitterness of the feud between the White House and Republicans over Benghazi. ".
Lets Get Real:
This blog is pointing its finger at the Oval or someone close to the Oval, US intelligence cant have been that slow to work out that the terrorist attack on the US Consulate in Libya was planned. The spin that it was a mob and linked to a video helped the Oval far to much for it to be unexpected, thus the intelligence talking points were washed by the White House. The question IS WHO washed the information, who gave the order, who sent Ambassador Rice to the networks to be economic with the truth. One would have to reason that is was the Oval, why such a push to make Rice the next Secretary of State after Hillary Clinton, in less to keep her on board, in other words to make sure she does not point the finger at the Oval. This stinks folks, what is worse is that the uber liberal main stream media are not really going after the Oval, they seem to take direction from the Oval. GROW UP PRESS.