The New York Times: Reports " Celebrating a 25-Year-Old Clinton Win, but Still Stung by a More Recent Defeat "
Lets Get Real:
HRC expected to win in 2016, the Crown was there for the taking, and she failed. Whatever you think of President Trump he had his finger on the pulse of the US voter, the same as Bill Clinton had in 1992. The sexual allegations against Bill Clinton should have taken him down in 1992 and they didn't, the US voter wanted someone who would fix the economy, the same with Trump, The Clintons created Trump in way in 1998, the liberal defence of Bill Clinton at its core was that the affair with the intern did not stop him doing his job, the US Presidency in their eyes did not mean you had to have a morale President, well then you have Trump in 2016. On Fox News it was reported that Bill Clinton asked HRC why she was not doing polling and going to the rust belt States, HRC it is stated told the Old Hound Dog that he didn't understand modern politics or how data was used as a tool in modern elections. A pastor on CNN stated a wise thought, " Data does not vote ". HRC did not need the FBI to lose in 2016, that is a lesson that some ultra loyal Clinton supporters do not understand, HRC is a BAD CANDIDATE, she learned nothing from the Old Hound Dog.