Seymour M. Hersh on Iran and the USA

The New Yorker: A article on the covert actions taken by the USA in Iran. Israel Planning for a hit on Iran is not discussed. Read of the Day.

Iran and Liberals

USA Today: Looks at the problem of Iran, the article shows more about the paper than Iran. They are concerned about the reaction should the USA attack Iran by Air. The main worry should be a nuclear attack on Israel by Iran. The USA should diplomacy fail will have to attack Iran. Its a matter of when not if when it comes to Iran.

Elite Media and Iraq

New York Post: A look at how the elite media is dealing with the success in Iraq. That's a correction how they are not dealing with the success, is that a great surprise these days. Must Read of the Day.

New York Times and Iran

New York Times: Another editorial by the Times, one has to ask, have they learned nothing from the 1930s and Appeasement. The Paper of Record seems to think that talking with Iran and making them feels safe will push Iran in to giving up its Nuclear armed aspirations. The reverse is true, they will use the time to build their weapons, they will string out the process and then we have a nuclear armed Iran. Then Israel will attack then we just might have WW3. President George W. Bush might not be their favorite President of the Times but it does not make him wrong when it comes to Iran.

Iran, Liberals and the Truth

Chicago Sun - Times: The first line tells you all you need to know, "Americans don't want to be tricked into another unjustified, unvetted war. " The Elite Media is in Appeasement mode with Iran. The Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Sun - Times, who else, what a shame for American Press Intelligence.

Liberals and Iran

Washington Post: Another article that could be written by the Howard Dean and that's not a compliment. Why do the Elite Papers have an aversion to the truth of International Politics, they take comfort from words of peace for Iran that have been used for years to play out a process that leads to a nuclear armed Iran. The WP should know better, Iran will use the weakness of Liberals in the USA to play out a long game and when its to late announce that it has a the bomb. Israel will not allow this then we just might have WW3. The Elite Media should be stronger it should be tough on Iran, not fall for a slight scraps of peace which are an illusion. The attack is coming on Iran, WP GROW UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE DON'T BECAME THE NEW YORK TIMES.

Iran and the Media

Lets have a look at what the Beltway Echo is on Iran.

Washington Post: The post hits the nail on the head, " Iran has become the new Iraq " Hillary Clinton is smart enough to know that she cant box herself in as a peace nick when it comes to Iran or the 2008 election is over. Those that oppose her from Obama to Edwards wont win, that is the hard fact, the press wont say it, they need a political race, they have to justify their bar pills. The Liberal Media Elite in its own way because it hates the Bush Administration beyond its hatred of Richard Nixon wants to box in the next President, they want a Democratic President. Hillary Clinton I hope wont play their silly game, as possibly the next President she might have to deal with Iran and take military action.

Boston Globe: One word folks, Appeasement, what an Editorial, like something out of the 1930s. Here is what BG thinks is a good policy, " The threats from Bush and Cheney only make it harder to determine whether there is any deal Iran would accept to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons. " The paper is missing the point, the West should define the deal that protects the interest of the West full stop. To be honest I don't care about the Security of Iran, only within a context of Western Security. Read this editorial to understand the American left, be very afraid for the security of the West if they had any influence of American Foreign Policy.

Not WW3 ?

New York Times: Interesting article in the NYT on the reaction to the view in the White House that a Nuclear Armed Iran could lead to WW3. The paper of record takes a different view, its shows a picture from a seminal American TV movie, The Day after, done in the mid 80s to show the USA after a War. Ironic it was shown here in the UK on the Sci- Fi Channel. The paper of record sees it as " more like chess " game within the context of the USA and Russian relationship. That's the problem with the New York Times, it sees what it wants to see, this hard ball politics, its a chess game yes but the object of the game is to prevent a nuclear armed Iran. If Diplomacy fails and it will, the games will end and the West will have to hit Iran hard. The winner can only be the West, nothing less would be a victory for Iran, and we are back to the 1930s again, then Israel would have to hit Iran from the Air, and if that happens that could cause havoc in the Middle East. The West, UK, USA and France must act to protect the national security of the West.

Iran and the Elite Media

An interesting article in the Chicago Tribune on Iran, " The price Iran is paying for international defiance is growing. But to stop its nuclear ambitions, that price needs to grow steeper--fast. " More pressure on Iran NOW will avert more military action in the future.